Thursday, May 29, 2008

Goddess Glory on Poly / Multiple sex partners

Goddess Glory
http://goddessglory.blogspot.com/


2 comments:

BCR said...

This is the most ridiculous benighted disjunctive philosophical rhetoric I've ever heard. Clearly, she is expressing her inner child of fear of abandonment and unloved feelings. Poliamourous relationships are shallow and don't fully work because there is never complete trust. There is one party who doesn't need the other partner enough to deny themselves outside relationships, and the the other party who goes along with it in which to sustain the relationship. In some cases In her case, she wants to protect herself by having a others who will be there for her when her partner veers off into other relations. He argument is that she wants him to get a true submissive to take out his sadist torment on, while she possibly have relations with a man who will give her something she needs. Then in the next breath she speaks to needing the safety of having someone who will always be there for her that she can depend on. Sounds to me she is finding her way through the confusion of her inner child.

I to can have loveless sex. However, I discovered that the inability to trust, was used used as a protective mechanism due to being a child of divorce. As a result my actions and created emotional energy blockage. I still have the ability to actively turn off like a light switch. I have walked away from relationships over the smallest things without emotion, or for warning to my partner. For me it is is easy to bring down the shield of protection by switching from a loving to an emotionless human being. However, I've discovered that over the years it can erode the soul and block bliss. The human experience encompasses the gamut of happiness and disappointment. It is up to us to chose people who are willing to love us in a way that we want to be loved. In doing so we take the chance of love lost and maybe even some sacrifice. But enlightenment and bliss from the realm of the sacred secrets shared and life lived together are so worth it. But, I guess it doesn't matter anyway because after clicking the link on your blog I see that she is selling clips of her sacred secrets which solidifies that she is all rhetoric. It's complete bull shit because she is a "servicer whore". I hope that people aren't buying into that malarkey. Because she doesn't represent the dominant Black Woman AT ALL.

Any way, just a thought. That video invoked this rant. So, so have blissful day!

Best, BCR from smoothfemdom.blogspot.com

GoddessGlory said...

Wow. I found your blog searching for more of Pierre F Walter's writings, and definitely didn't expect to see a post featuring a video of mine (which I took down by the way). It's funny to see someone try to break down my "inner self" when they don't even know me. Polyamoury doesn't always fail, in fact it's been apart of a few cultures, especially with men have multiple wives, but also Polyandry with women with multiple husbands. I've read that some tribes in Sudan and Ethopia (maybe even more) where extramarital affairs were excepted and expect (especially among younger couples) as long as they were done outside of the view of the spouse. Human beings have the ability to relate to each other any way they see fit. This video was posted some 2-3 years ago, and I still have this desire even though I've matured and has even rejected sadomasochism and fetishism. My future is sustainable community building, I envision myself having sexual relations with anyone I love and who loves me. To say that this can't happen because people in our culture can't seem to be able to love each other and seem to be capable of only perverted intimacy doesn't mean that I am. This guy who believes that black women rules is totally ignorant of matriarchal Nigeria were sects of people where women have multiple husbands that they do have sex with.